新一年的第三场考试, 仍然是过往的老题。几乎没有任何粉饰, 跃然纸上了。就业类的题目在刚刚过去的2016年当中出现的频率并不算高，然而它却算得上是较为常见的命题范围。尤其是对工作满意度和稳定性的论证更是较为常见的话题之一. 此题在2014年10月25号就与各位考生见过面。请听环球教育颜王团杨亮老师解析。

　　题目如下:

　　Some people believe that job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others believe that people cannot always enjoy their jobs and that a permanent job is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 20170114

　　仔细审题不难发现，本题目算是较为传统的双边讨论问题。因此，对于考生的要求就是千万不要忽略或者过度强调其中一个方面的论证。并且，考上应该有自己清晰的结论。

　　一个简单的例文如下, 供各位参考。

　　Although majority of job seekers long for jobs with both satisfaction and security, nearly all positions can only offer one of the two. Among all those who are seeking for jobs, there thus emerges a debate whether satisfaction from jobs is of more significance than stability.

　　用简单的因果方式，介绍背景的同时引出了文章的题目。在此段中笔者并未表达自身立场。

　　For one thing, it is generally known that job satisfaction contributes substantially to both people’s life quality and career success. To start with, all employees in this present-day society must spend a considerable proportion of their time on their work, so that once people are able to gain sufficient enjoyment from their jobs, they are more likely to have more positive and affirmative attitudes toward their life. By analogy, their life quality can be elevated enormously. On top of this, people with jobs full of satisfaction have more possibilities to achieve their career success. The prime cause is that those people are willing to devote their time and energy to their work, and due to their efforts they will naturally achieve more than others.

　　此段为并列段, 既从两个并列的论点入手论证了工作满意度的重要性。本段主要回击题干中提及的第一个观点。

　　For another, advocates for job security argue that permanent jobs imply stable and constant income, which can be thought to be the most considerably basic foundation of their living. Without it, people might suffer from financial stress, therefore resulting in the fact that they may pay less attention and energy to their work. Notwithstanding, admittedly stable jobs usually refer to some repetitive and monotonous positions without any novelty that can arouse people's interest. Namely, people with jobs like this will lose their enthusiasm day by day to their work, subsequently causing that they will be washed out by their work reluctantly or they may give up their jobs voluntarily. Hence, putting emphasis on job stability only is not rational at all.

　　To sum up, as to job hunters, obviously job satisfaction ought to be given the priority in most cases, and meanwhile job security can only provide a stable income and spark off a greater loss for them.

　　由于在前面两个主段的论证过程中，笔者有意地强调一个观点的优点和另一个观点的缺点。所以本文的笔者立场就顺理成章地在结尾段被阐述清楚。